January Hot Streak Ends on a Cold Note

February 8, 2018

The global financial crisis finally appears to be in the rear-view mirror. In its place is synchronized expansion across most developed and emerging economies

Monthly snapshot

  • Equities were generally stronger around the world in January, but experienced a significant risk-off move near the end of the month that reverberated through the beginning of February.
  • Major developed-market government-bond rates advanced across essentially all maturities. Local-currency-denominated emerging-market debt was the best-performing segment of the fixed-income universe, while U.S. Treasurys lagged.
  • Rather than worry about the stock market’s valuation, or trying to time the market in anticipation of a short-term correction, we believe it’s better to focus on long-term investment goals.

Economic backdrop

The U.S. government shut down for several days in the middle of January before congressional Republicans and Democrats agreed to pass another stopgap spending bill that was expected to last for three weeks. The Trump administration announced tariffs on imported solar panels and washing machines in a move designed to protect American manufacturers from lower-priced overseas competition, garnering mixed responses. The president also openly contemplated renegotiating membership in the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement after bowing out a year ago. Fourth-quarter earnings appeared strong: three-quarters of S&P 500 Index constituents that reported their numbers thus far (about half as of February 2) pointed to positive earnings surprises; an even higher number of companies had favorable sales surprises.1 U.S. oil production in November, reported on the last day of January, topped 10 million barrels per day for the first time since 1970.

U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May announced plans in late January to limit the free movement and residency rights of European Union (EU) citizens starting in the post-Brexit transition period despite demands from EU negotiators for status quo through the end of 2020. An impact report prepared for the Department for Exiting the EU was leaked to the media, painting a bleak picture of potential Brexit outcomes for the U.K. economy. Negotiations over the formation of a grand coalition in Germany continued through month-end, with the expectation of a pact in early February—indicating the likely continuation of pro-EU government in Europe’s largest economy. Italy’s euro-sceptic Five-Star Movement, the best-polling individual party heading into an early March election, dropped a promise to hold a referendum on pulling Europe’s third-largest economy out of the euro. Conservative parties are expected to win the largest combined share of votes, however, and form a governing bloc; some anticipated coalition members are still weighing a euro departure.

Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair Janet Yellen presided over her last monetary policy meeting on January 31 (at which no changes were made), as her four-year term came to an end. The European Central Bank (ECB) and Bank of Japan (BOJ) similarly announced no changes to their policy programs. The BOJ kept its quarterly economic projections steady; although the central bank’s announcement in early January of reduced long-term bond purchases propelled yields and the yen upward (yields and prices move inversely). The Bank of England’s (BOE) Monetary Policy Committee had no January meeting.

Equity markets were generally higher around the world in January, but experienced a significant risk-off move near the end of the month that reverberated through the beginning of February. Major developed-market government-bond rates advanced across essentially all maturities. The 2-year Treasury yield rose above 2% for the first time since September 2008, and the 10-year yield reached its highest level in almost four years; the 30-year yield, while elevated, remained below its 2017 peak. The U.S. dollar continued to slide, touching its lowest level (against major foreign currencies on a trade-weighted basis) in more than three years.

The solid pace of growth in U.S. manufacturing activity was essentially maintained in January, while non-manufacturing growth accelerated by far more than expected. Unemployment held at 4.1% in January, and average-hourly-earnings growth accelerated to a 2.9% year-over-year rate. Personal-income growth increased in December, while consumer-spending growth decelerated and inflation pressures appeared to remain contained. Employment costs were reported near the high end of their expected ranges in fourth-quarter productivity reports. The first estimate of fourth-quarter economic growth indicated a 2.6% annualized rate, which was a disappointment following the 3.2% pace in the third quarter.

U.K. services sector activity slowed during January, but remained firmly in expansion territory, while construction growth decelerated to just above a standstill. Manufacturing growth also moderated, but at healthier levels. Claimant count unemployment edged down in December from the prior month’s upward-revised figure, pushing the rate higher. The September-to-November unemployment rate and average earnings growth for the one-year period ending November were unchanged—at 4.3% and 2.5%, respectively—from the previous report. The British economy grew by 0.5% in the fourth quarter, according to an early estimate, improving slightly compared to the prior three-month period.

Eurozone momentum carried into the New Year as services sector growth hastened to impressive levels and manufacturing growth (while modestly lower) also showed remarkable strength. The unemployment rate was an unchanged 8.7% in December; however, 134,000 Europeans found work during the month (almost matching November’s upward-revised gain) and the youth unemployment rate declined. Preliminary overall fourth-quarter economic growth was measured at 0.6% (and 2.7% year over year).

U.S. Equities advanced during the month, led by large caps, while growth stocks continued to outpace value.

Portfolio review

U.S. equities advanced during the month, led by large caps, while growth stocks continued to outpace value. Our large-cap strategy performed well, primarily via an underweight to high-dividend-yielding (and thus interest-rate-sensitive) sectors such as utilities, telecommunications and real estate, which lagged as interest rates increased. Selection within the technology sector was also beneficial. Our small-cap strategy was challenged by selection within the energy, consumer discretionary and healthcare sectors. Overseas, developed markets mostly kept pace with U.S. large caps, and our international strategy lagged due to selection in airline, semiconductor and energy stocks. Positioning in financials (especially Italian banks) partially offset these weak spots. Regionally, selection in Japan and ex-benchmark countries also detracted. Emerging markets performed best; our strategy was held back by exposure to technology stocks that came under pressure, and by selection within the consumer sectors.

The U.S. investment-grade bond market slid in January; our core fixed-income strategy fared relatively well, as non-government sectors generally outperformed comparable Treasurys. A slightly shorter-duration posture and yield-curve-flattening bias enhanced returns as short-term yields increased by more than long-term yields. Selection in and an overweight to financials contributed, while an underweight to industrials moderately detracted. An allocation to non-agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) was additive, while positioning in underperforming agency MBS was a drag on performance. An overweight to asset-backed securities (ABS)—tempered by an underweight to sub-prime auto securitizations (which have seen increased delinquency rates) and an allocation to student loan securitization—was beneficial. The strategy gained on an overweight to commercial MBS (CMBS); however, our higher-quality bias weighed on returns, as did underweights to taxable municipals and sovereign issuers.

Major Index Performance in January 2018 (% return)

major index performance

Light orange: Fixed income. Dark orange: Equities. Sources: FactSet, Lipper.


The high-yield market was strong; our strategy performed well, due primarily to an allocation to collateralized-debt obligation and selection in basic industry and technology and electronics. Positioning in healthcare and energy detracted somewhat. Emerging-market debt had a solid month; our strategy outperformed given a continued emphasis on local-currency bonds as the U.S. dollar weakened. Specifically, an overweight to Brazilian local debt and an underweight to Philippines local debt contributed, while an underweight to Hungarian local debt and an off-benchmark position to Qatar detracted.

Manager positioning and opportunities

The U.S. economic environment and earnings landscape remain favorable but, as we have noted for some time, markets are at risk due to stretched valuations, rising interest rates and disruptive geopolitical events. Our large-cap strategy maintained its value orientation and underweight to defensive sectors with high dividend yields and elevated interest-rate sensitivity. Our small-cap strategy was also positioned to reflect a cautious outlook by favoring stability and momentum, and preserving weights to high-conviction value managers. Positioning in our international developed-market strategy was mostly unchanged in January—only slightly reducing an overweight to growth and momentum stocks and maintaining a small underweight to value and defensive stocks. Regionally, Japan and Australia remained underweight, and financials was still the largest sector underweight. Within emerging markets, we retained an underweight to Asia (mostly via Taiwan, Malaysia and Korea) and an overweight to India. We remained overweight to Latin America, with ex-benchmark exposure to Argentina.

Fixed-Income Performance January 2018 (% return)

fixed income performance

Sources: FactSet, Lipper. See "Corresponding Indexes for Fixed-Income Performance Exhibit"

Regional Equity Performance, Jan. 2018 (% return)

equity performance jan 2018

Light orange: Countries. Dark orange: Regions. Sources: FactSet, Lipper. See "Corresponding Indexes for Fixed-Income Performance Exhibit"


Our core fixed-income strategy continued to gradually reduce its yield-curve-flattening bias, as the curve flattened during 2017. We remained slightly overweight to corporates, with an overweight to banking offset by neutral-to-underweight exposures to industrials and utilities. Overweights to ABS and CMBS remained, with an emphasis on higher-quality securities, given their competitive risk-adjusted yields. We also maintained an allocation to non-agency MBS and had a neutral weight to agency MBS. Managers were generally in gradual risk-reduction mode, waiting for an opportunity to add risk at more attractive valuations. Within emerging markets, an overweight to local-currency debt was stable through January. Our largest country overweights were to Argentina, Brazil, Czech Republic and Egypt, while the most significant underweights were to Philippines, Hungary and Peru.

When speaking to investors who are nervous about the stock market’s valuation, we urge them to keep a longer-term focus. Timing the market in anticipation of a short-term correction should be discouraged.

Our view

The global financial crisis finally appears to be in the rear-view mirror. In its place is synchronized expansion across most developed and emerging economies. Admittedly, developed economies continued to run at a rather sluggish pace of 2% to 2.5% gross domestic product (GDP) growth. This is, at best, a middling sort of performance in the context of the past five decades. Emerging-market economies, meanwhile, continued to expand at a clip well below that of the past 20 years. Over the next year or so, we think global growth can still be vibrant enough to allow risk assets to perform well.

U.S. tax legislation is hardly perfect: we do not expect it to be as stimulative as advertised since tax cuts are skewed toward upper-income tax payers who tend to have a higher saving rate than the median household. But the permanent corporate tax changes, repatriation holiday, and the full expensing of capital equipment purchases over the next five years are positive developments for economic growth and investment.

Security analysts, always an optimistic lot, are calling for an 11% rise in S&P 500 Index per-share operating earnings in 2018. Although earnings estimates tend to fade through the year as estimates adjust to reality, this time may be an exception because tax cuts have not yet been taken fully into account.

The major worry for investors comes down to the stock market’s valuation. A little more than three-fifths of the S&P 500 Index’s price gain in 2017 came from improving earnings, while the rest was due to a rise in the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. But elevated valuations can be justified by the low level of bond yields and the strong trend in profits growth. Of course the higher the valuation, the more vulnerable the stock market becomes to unexpected bad news. The market is overdue for a correction—in 2017, the S&P 500 Index didn’t even register a price pullback of 3%—and we have already witnessed a peak-to-trough decline of greater magnitude from late January through the beginning of February.

We won’t be really concerned, though, unless we see a more aggressive swing in Fed policy toward monetary tightness—something we don’t anticipate in the coming year. It’s possible that the U.S. will see inflation pressures finally begin to build in the New Year, but U.S. companies have proven able to maintain profit margins without resorting to price increases.

In our opinion, Europe has more growth potential than the U.S. According to the World Economic Forum’s annual report on global competitiveness, the high-income countries of Western Europe have made important strides in improving labor-market efficiency over the last five years. We also would note that political concerns in the eurozone are far more muted compared with a year ago, although we have not yet seen the end of the heavy anti-establishment undercurrent.

Given our view that the region is a long way from employment levels that will stir inflation pressures, we expect monetary policy to be supportive of growth throughout the coming year—even as the ECB proceeds with tapering its quantitative-easing program. Since we expect these asset purchases will continue at least until the end of September, it appears that policy rates will stay put until 2019.

Global Equity Sector Performance 1/18 (% return)

percent return

Light orange: Defensives. Dark orange: Blends. Red: Cyclicals. Sources: FactSet, Lipper, MSCI ACWI Index Components (as defined by SEI)


We therefore believe the path is clear for further economic growth in the year ahead. The strong 2017 revival in corporate revenues and earnings should continue; the MSCI European Economic and Monetary Union Index (Total Return) forward P/E ratio was no higher as of December 31, 2017, than it was a year earlier. Solid economic growth and cheap equity valuations are usually a good combination for investors.

These have not been easy days for U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May. The divorce stage of Brexit talks has finally concluded, with the U.K. mostly acceding to the EU’s demands. But Parliament has begun to flex its muscles—and disapproval there would force the parties back to the negotiating table. Keep in mind that any changes to the withdrawal agreement demanded by Parliament would require unanimous approval of the 27 members of the EU on the other side of the negotiating table.

The BOE’s Monetary Policy Committee forecasted only two rate increases between now and the end of 2019. While time will tell whether the central bank’s view regarding future policy moves are accurate, policymakers in the U.K. face tremendous challenges over the next few years. We think investors should tread lightly until there are clearer signs that inflation pressures have peaked and Brexit negotiations actually yield a favorable economic outcome for the country.

Japan is clearly benefiting from the global economic recovery. Exports to China are growing particularly quickly, and are now about equal to the share going to the U.S. Exports to the U.S. and Europe also have accelerated, but not to the same extent.

Although there have been rumblings that the BOJ would like to take a step away from the extraordinary monetary policies that have been in place since the financial crisis, the central bank may find it difficult to do so. Domestic demand remains weak and the population has begun contracting, a trend that will likely accelerate.

Japanese equities did well last year. Remarkably, the forward P/E ratio declined since the beginning over the course of 2017 despite the improvement in economic fundamentals. It remains one of the more-cheaply valued stock markets among developed countries. Forward-earnings estimates have climbed sharply in the past year; we note that revenue estimates are also inflecting higher.

Emerging-market equities climbed significantly last year, with a particularly strong contribution from China. Despite some backsliding last year, China has continued to reduce its dependence on heavy industry and increase the value added to GDP from service-producing industries. While these macro statistics need to be taken with a grain of salt, it appears that China’s growth has accelerated significantly from two years ago and is advancing at its fastest clip since the 2012 to 2013 period. If China can maintain positive momentum, commodity prices should continue to rally as well.

We have held a positive view of risk assets for most of this long bull market. When speaking to investors who are nervous about the stock market’s valuation, we urge them to keep a longer-term focus. Timing the market in anticipation of a short-term correction should be discouraged. As we’ve seen in the past year, making a major de-risking move could result in a significant opportunity-loss when there are few, if any, signs of major economic imbalances or frothy valuations. Until we see a more significant deterioration in the economic and financial fundamentals that have underpinned the global bull market in risk assets over the past two years, our default investment stance is to stay the course.

There are many possible events and developments that could have a big negative impact, but most have a low probability of actually happening. We will therefore maintain our “risk-on” bias until we see evidence that such a stance merits revision.

Global indexes and definitions


Key Measures: January 2018

Sources: Bloomberg, FactSet, Lipper

Dow Jones Industrial Average
S&P 500 Index
NASDAQ Composite Index
MSCI ACWI Index (Net)
Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Index
Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index 
PRIOR: 11.04
WTI Cushing crude oil prices
PRIOR: $60.42
Sterling vs. U.S. dollar
Euro vs. U.S. dollar
U.S. dollar vs. yen
Corresponding Indexes for Fixed-Income Performance Exhibit
U.S. High Yield: BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Master II Constrained Index
Global Sovereigns: Bloomberg Barclays Global Treasury Bond Index
Global Non-Government: Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-Treasury Index
Emerging Markets (Local): JPMorgan GBI-EM Global Diversified Index
Emerging Markets (External): JPMorgan EMBI Global Diversified Index
U.S. Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS): Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Mortgage Backed Securities Index
U.S. Asset-Backed Securities (ABS): Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Asset-Backed Securities Index
U.S. Treasurys: Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury Index
U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS): Bloomberg Barclays 1-10 Year U.S. TIPS Index
U.S. Investment-Grade Corporates: Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate Investment Grade Index
Corresponding Indexes for Regional Equity Performance Exhibit
United States: S&P 500 Index
United Kingdom:  FTSE All-Share Index
Pacific ex Japan: MSCI Pacific ex Japan Index (Net)
Japan: TOPIX, also known as the Tokyo Stock Price Index
Europe ex UK: MSCI Europe ex UK Index (Net)
EM Latin America: MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America Index (Net)

Legal Note


This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific point in time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events, or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding the Funds or any stock in particular, nor should it be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell a security, including futures contracts.

There are risks involved with investing, including loss of principal. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risks as well. International investments may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuation in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic or political instability in other nations. Narrowly focused investments and smaller companies typically exhibit higher volatility. Bonds and bond funds will decrease in value as interest rates rise. High-yield bonds involve greater risks of default or downgrade and are more volatile than investment-grade securities, due to the speculative nature of their investments. Emerging markets involve heightened risks related to the same factors as well as increased volatility and lower trading volume.

Diversification may not protect against market risk. There is no assurance the objectives discussed will be met. Past performance does not guarantee future results Index returns are for illustrative purposes only and do not represent actual portfolio performance. Index returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. One cannot invest directly in an index.

Information provided by SEI Investments Management Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of SEI Investments Company (SEI). Neither SEI nor its subsidiaries is affiliated with your financial advisor.