Market commentary
Looking ahead to 2025, investors are surely in for an interesting year. We’ll examine some of the risks, both positive and negative, facing Canada’s economy in our fourth quarter market commentary.
A single-market rising tide fails to lift all stock boats.
In our last outlook, we said that the fourth quarter of 2024 promised to be at least as interesting as the third quarter had been, and that certainly proved to be the case. Looking ahead to 2025, investors are surely in for an interesting year. We’ll examine some of the risks, both positive and negative, facing Canada’s economy, as well as some of the “known unknowns” investors may want to keep an eye on.
The Canadian economy continues to chart its own path in terms of economic growth, inflation, and central bank policy. Relative to other advanced economies, inflation remains well behaved, giving the Bank of Canada (BOC) ample room for further interest-rate cuts. That should be supportive of economic activity, although as we noted last quarter, a widening divide between Canadian and U.S. interest rates could put downward pressure on the Canadian dollar at times.
Recent purchasing manager surveys have also shown an interesting divergence between Canada and the rest of the world. Whereas most countries were recently seeing still-healthy sentiment in services and slumping sentiment in manufacturing, the latest surveys in Canada showed the opposite.1 Although tempting to attribute Canada’s services downturn to constrained consumers and manufacturing strength to a weaker Canadian dollar (which makes Canadian goods cheaper for foreign buyers), the underlying causes might prove more temporary. For example, some services survey respondents placed blame on the postal strike, while some respondents to the manufacturing survey believed recent strength might be attributable to U.S. buyers front-running expected tariff hikes from the incoming administration of Donald Trump. Time will tell. The good news, in these reports and others, is that the Canadian economy seems likely to continue avoiding recession barring any major surprises (more on those later). It should also be noted, however, that both surveys reported some strengthening in price pressures. While we don’t expect inflation to reaccelerate dramatically in Canada, it does fit with SEI’s view that central banks’ “last mile” in the inflation fight could be a long one.
In addition to weaker sentiment in the services sector and the impacts of port- and postal-worker strikes on an already slow-rowing economy, there are some clear and present risks to account for, listed roughly here in terms of potential impact. First, the federal government’s decision to markedly reduce immigration of temporary workers may cause the labour market to tighten and thus contribute to a modest reacceleration of inflation, all else equal (though it may also reduce housing-price pressures at the margin). Second, household balance sheets in aggregate are still overextended and home affordability remains at a generational low.
Finally—and most obvious at the moment—are the punitive tariffs rates being threatened against Canada and other trading partners by U.S. President-elect Trump. The only point of clarity thus far is that U.S. trade barriers will be higher, while the specifics of what these will look like are anyone’s guess. Businesses and consumers on both sides of the border will have to adapt as the trade battles unfold and actual U.S. trade policies become clearer. The widespread hope is that, as with the first Trump administration, tariffs are used as a negotiating tool to reconfigure trade patterns or gain immigration concessions without massively undermining the current trading system.
Despite these risks, the Canadian economy should enjoy some tailwinds in 2025 beyond the rebound in manufacturing sentiment. The goods-and-services-tax holiday, although only a couple months in duration, should be welcomed by consumers. Two important tweaks to mortgage regulations—increasing the price cap on insured mortgages, which should reduce down payments, along with extending maturities to 30 years from 25 for first-time buyers or new construction—should provide some support to residential real estate activity. And most importantly, the progress made on inflation should allow interest rates to continue falling, which would be supportive of housing and consumers more broadly. None of these will solve Canada’s economic challenges overnight, but they point in a positive direction.
In addition to the policy risks emanating from the U.S., domestic politics are clearly in turmoil. With his recent resignation, Prime Minister Trudeau joins the list of incumbent casualties around the world. Unfortunately, it now appears the Canadian federal government will be less than fully functional as the Trump administration takes office. That said, the 44th Parliament has had a long run by historic standards, as has the Liberal Party leader, so perhaps a change of the guard was in order. The Canadian electorate certainly seems to think so, as we pointed out last quarter. Similar to trade relations with the U.S., much remains to be seen with domestic politics and policies. The Conservative Party still looks poised to assume power. However, based on historical timeframes, that might not happen until spring or even summer of 2025. Suffice to say, when it is finally formed, the new government will have its work cut out for it.
Foreign-exchange volatility is another area of concern. The U.S. dollar rallied sharply in the fourth quarter against a wide range of currencies, including the Canadian dollar. Developments on the domestic and U.S. fronts could cause exchange-rate volatility in either direction. For now, the widening interest rate differential between Canada and the U.S. (something we touched on last quarter) could keep the loonie under pressure. Finally, public health risks are an issue that’s probably flying under most investors’ radars. While we’re all dealing with pandemic exhaustion to varying degrees thanks to COVID-19, we should keep an eye on avian influenza (“bird flu”) and the current H5N1 strain. Related to this risk, it’s interesting (and a bit troubling) to note that, in many countries, disability rates have increased in recent years. For example, in Canada, disability rates increased by a statistically significant extent across all age groups between 2017 and 2022,2 and in the U.S., disability numbers have climbed steadily in recent years, approaching 35 million individuals at the end of 2024. If there’s a silver lining to these data, it’s that that a higher percentage of disabled individuals have been able to join the workforces in some countries. But if disabilities are truly rising, that could add to the challenge of slow-or-no productivity growth (another theme we’ve touched on in recent quarters).
The increasing-disability phenomenon isn’t limited to North America, and it is reported to have multiple causes. However, the after-effects of COVID-19 infections are believed to be a contributing factor, and a recent study estimated that the cumulative number of people worldwide who’ve suffered with “long COVID,” or lingering health effects following acute infection, is around 400 million.3 Taken by itself, this is a challenge that societies will continue to manage with varying degrees of success. But it would become far more worrisome in a pandemic caused by certain strains of avian influenza. Thus far, reported symptoms of individuals infected with H5N1 have ranged from mild to severe, and public health institutions have not identified any cases of human-to-human transmission, which is reassuring. But this is one of those low-probability, high-impact events that, should it come to pass, could cause significant market volatility and economic disruptions. The world is as interesting as ever, and there is a raft of challenges facing businesses, consumers, politicians, policymakers, and public health officials. By comparison, an investor’s job is pretty simple. Be sure your portfolio is suited to your financial objectives and provides ample diversification of risks, and stick with it.
Global investors weathered quite a year in 2024, including global central bank pivots to easy monetary policy, voter pivots to opposition parties, rapidly rising national debt levels, and escalating geopolitical strife. Markets responded with solid returns for risk assets as monetary stimulus was added to the fiscal stimulus punch bowl. Fixed-income returns struggled, with rising longer-term yields fostered by stubborn inflation and swelling government debt. Precious metals and cryptocurrencies were notable performers on heightened demand from central banks and retail investors, respectively, while familiar themes repeated themselves—including another banner year for the “Magnificent 7” mega-cap tech stocks in the U.S. and another disappointing (if not slightly encouraging) year for Chinese stimulus expectations. Lastly, investors were treated to a lump of coal from U.S. policy-makers in December, as the Federal Reserve (Fed) took a hawkish turn, calling into question the future path of policy rates in the world’s largest economy.
Within the equity markets, corporate earnings have surprised to the upside and have shown strength outside of big tech, while lower taxes and less regulation should be a bigger boost to mid- and small-sized companies. In addition, markets outside of the U.S. are far from priced to perfection as both earnings expectations and valuation multiples have more room to move higher. We expect additional stimulus from the European Central Bank given weakness in the core of Europe and further efforts from China to find the right mix of both fiscal and monetary stimulus measures. Not surprisingly, we maintain our strategic recommendations for investors to stay diversified globally and focus on profitable companies with strong earnings momentum trading at reasonable prices. Given our views on the likelihood of higher interest rates and heightened volatility, we continue to lean into value and active management across our equity strategies. We favor sectors such as financials, industrials, and staples. Within fixed-income markets, we remain cautious on interest rates and sanguine on credit. We believe the Fed is still biased toward lower rates (although we may see a pause in early 2025) despite core consumer price index and gross domestic product readings both above 3%. In addition, the reality of tariffs and immigration reforms may add additional fuel to the inflation fire early in the year. Therefore, given our outlook for higher long-term interest rates, we see headwinds for fixed-income returns. On a more positive note, while credit spreads have limited room to tighten, absolute yields remain attractive, defaults remain low, and maturities have been extended. Carry strategies in high-yield bonds and collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) should perform well.
Global equity markets, as measured by the MSCI ACWI Index, recorded modest losses in U.S. dollar terms over the fourth quarter, but still finished in positive territory for the 2024 calendar year. Strength in the U.S. could not offset downturns in other developed countries and emerging markets, which declined significantly in U.S. dollar terms during the quarter. Notably, in Canadian dollar terms, global equities had a strong quarter. There was a brief, sharp rally in the U.S. in the first half of November in response to former President Trump’s victory in the presidential election, as investors expressed optimism that the new administration’s proposed tax cuts and loosening of regulations will boost economic growth. All three major U.S. equity market indexes—the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the broad-market S&P 500 Index, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index—established record highs during the quarter. Among developed markets, Europe was particularly hard-hit amid concerns about political stability in France and Germany, as well as economic weakness. Emerging-market stocks lost ground due to investors’ concerns about the potential impact of Trump’s proposed tariffs on goods imported to the U.S., as well as disappointment regarding the Chinese government’s fiscal stimulus.
North America, the only region to end the quarter in positive territory in U.S. dollar terms, was the top performer among developed markets, lifted by the rally in the U.S. Conversely, the Nordic countries were the weakest-performing developed markets due mainly to downturns in Denmark, Sweden, and Finland. The significant underperformance of Europe was attributable mainly to weakness in Portugal and Ireland. The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries led the emerging markets for the month, due largely to strength in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Kuwait, which garnered positive returns for the quarter. The weakest-performing emerging markets for the month included Latin America and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), hampered mainly by market declines in Brazil and Indonesia, respectively.4
Global fixed-income assets, as measured by the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index, declined 5.1% in USD for the quarter. High-yield bonds posted modest gains and were the strongest performers within the U.S. fixed-income market, followed by investment-grade corporate bonds, mortgage-backed securities (MBS), and U.S. Treasurys. Treasury yields declined for all maturities under one year over the quarter, and moved higher across the remainder of the curve. Yields on 2-, 3-, 5- and 10-year Treasury notes rose by corresponding margins of 0.59%, 0.69%, 0.80%, and 0.77%, ending the quarter at 4.25%, 4.27%, 4,38%, and 4.58%, respectively.5 The spread between 10- and 2-year notes widened from +0.15% to +0.33% over the quarter, as the yield curve remained positively sloped (longer-term yields exceeded shorter-term yields). A positively sloped yield curve generally indicates that the economy is expected to grow in the future.
Global commodity prices, as represented by the Bloomberg Commodity Index, dipped 0.4% in the fourth quarter. The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) and Brent crude oil prices rose 5.2% and 4.1%, respectively, over the quarter due initially to concerns about the escalation of the military conflict in the Middle East (possibly leading to supply constraints) and, later in the quarter, a decline in inventory in the U.S. The gold spot price was down 0.7%, pressured by Trump’s election victory, which sparked a rally in the U.S. dollar. (The gold price typically moves inversely to the greenback.) The 6.0% upturn in the New York Mercantile
Exchange (NYMEX) natural gas price during the quarter was attributable to increased demand spurred by below-average temperatures in much of the U.S. in December, as well as forecasts for continued cold weather in January. Wheat prices were down 5.6% for the period, hampered by increased production in Argentina, as well as U.S. dollar strength. (The wheat price typically moves inversely to the U.S. dollar.)
Trump, a Republican, defeated his Democratic Party opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, winning majorities in both the Electoral College and the popular vote. Trump is the first U.S. president since Grover Cleveland—who served from 1885 to 1889, and 1893 to 1897—to be elected to two non-consecutive terms. The president-elect ran on a populist platform focused on illegal immigration, crime, tariffs, and tax cuts.
On the geopolitical front, Ukraine launched U.S.-made long-range missiles into Russia for the first time in November. This action prompted Russian President Vladimir Putin to approve amendments to the nation’s nuclear doctrine, expanding the conditions under which Russia may use nuclear weapons. In Syria, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), an Islamist militant group, led a rebellion against the government of President Bashar al-Assad in late November and early December. HTS initially occupied Aleppo, Syria’s second-largest city, and then captured Damascus, the nation’s capital. Assad fled to Moscow, and the Russian government granted his request for asylum. The HTS subsequently formed a new transitional government in Syria.
(unless otherwise noted, data sourced to Bloomberg)
1See J.P. Morgan Global Composite PMI®, “Global growth accelerates as solid service sector expansion offsets manufacturing weakness,” 6 January 2025, available at https://www.pmi.spglobal.com/Public/Home/PressRelease/f94e193ddf214de5bdfa79062611f26c, S&P Global Canada Services PMI®, “Service sector activity falls in December,” 6 January 2025, available at https://www.pmi.spglobal.com/Public/Home/PressRelease/50c8fdd2032b4750bbe90efebd005496, and S&P Global Canada Manufacturing PMI®, “Growth of manufacturing sector sustained in December,”
2 January 2025, available at https://www.pmi.spglobal.com/Public/Home/PressRelease/61ac7ce9e2bb49cf83177f4b4d6be765.
3Al-Aly et al (09 August 2024), “Long COVID science, research and policy,” Nature Medicine 30, 2148-2164, available at https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03173-6.
4 All equity market performance statements are based on the MSCI ACWI Index.
5 According to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. As of December 31, 2024.
6 According to the ONS. December 18, 2024.
7 According to the ONS. December 13, 2024.
8 According to Eurostat. December 18, 2024. 9 According to Eurostat. November 14, 2024.
Important information
SEI Investments Canada Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of SEI Investments Company, is the Manager of the SEI Funds in Canada.
The information contained herein is for general and educational information purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, research or investment advice regarding the Funds or any security in particular, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment. This information should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell a security, derivative or futures contract. You should not act or rely on the information contained herein without obtaining specific legal, tax, accounting and investment advice from an investment professional. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific point in time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events, or a guarantee of future results. There is no assurance as of the date of this material that the securities mentioned remain in or out of the SEI Funds.